PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 355

407 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which he has secured agreement with traditional turf cutters throughout the country who are being displaced arising from various conservation measures; the extent to which the various offers made are acceptable to him and the turf cutters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5580/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

31 January 2012

Last action

31 January 2012 · Turbary Rights

Status

written

Sponsors

Durkan, Bernard J.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

31 January 2012

Summary

407 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which he has secured agreement with traditional turf cutters throughout the country who are being displaced arising from various conservation measures; the extent to which the various offers made are acceptable to him and the turf cutters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5580/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 31 January 2012

    Turbary Rights

    407 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which he has secured agreement with traditional turf cutters throughout the country who are being displaced arising from various conservation measures; the extent to which the various offers made are acceptable to him and the turf cutters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5580/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

  • Durkan, Bernard J. · Asking member
  • Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht · Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.