PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 36

36 Mr. M. McDowell asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the possible future involvement of provisional Sinn Féin in the all-party talks at Stormont in the aftermath of the murder of a Garda at Adare, County Limerick, the explosion at Manchester and the discovery of an IRA bomb factory at Clonaslee, County Laois. [14648/96]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

4 July 1996

Last action

4 July 1996 · Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Peace Process.

Status

oral

Sponsors

McDowell, Michael.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 July 1996

Summary

36 Mr. M. McDowell asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the possible future involvement of provisional Sinn Féin in the all-party talks at Stormont in the aftermath of the murder of a Garda at Adare, County Limerick, the explosion at Manchester and the discovery of an IRA bomb factory at Clonaslee, County Laois. [14648/96]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 July 1996

    Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Peace Process.

    36 Mr. M. McDowell asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the possible future involvement of provisional Sinn Féin in the all-party talks at Stormont in the aftermath of the murder of a Garda at Adare, County Limerick, the explosion at Manchester and the discovery of an IRA bomb factory at Clonaslee, County Laois. [14648/96]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Peace Process.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • McDowell, Michael. · Asking member
  • Minister for Tánaiste · Minister for Tánaiste · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.