36 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 253 of 17 May 2011 if cognisance was given to the fact that a person’s (details supplied) income was less than their outgoings; that their situation was so adjudicated by a professional, that MABS in any event could not increase their payment and that the initial refusal of exceptional needs payment is in fact the catalyst in that failure to address the position at that stage has resulted in the present position which now requires the issue of an exceptional needs payment; if this issue can now be arranged; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13099/11]

Summary

36 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 253 of 17 May 2011 if cognisance was given to the fact that a person’s (details supplied) income was less than their outgoings; that their situation was so adjudicated by a professional, that MABS in any event could not increase their payment and that the initial refusal of exceptional needs payment is in fact the catalyst in that failure to address the position at that stage has resulted in the present position which now requires the issue of an exceptional needs payment; if this issue can now be arranged; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13099/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Social Welfare Code

  xml · EN · 26 May 2011

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.