PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 36

36. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the level that the general Government deficits from 2008 to 2009 would have been excluding deficit increasing direct payments to the banks from the general Government sector and excluding deficit reducing direct receipts from the banks to the general Government sector and what this is expected to be for 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50237/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 November 2012

Last action

15 November 2012 · General Government Debt

Status

written

Sponsors

Pearse Doherty

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 November 2012

Summary

36. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the level that the general Government deficits from 2008 to 2009 would have been excluding deficit increasing direct payments to the banks from the general Government sector and excluding deficit reducing direct receipts from the banks to the general Government sector and what this is expected to be for 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50237/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 November 2012

    General Government Debt

    36. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the level that the general Government deficits from 2008 to 2009 would have been excluding deficit increasing direct payments to the banks from the general Government sector and excluding deficit reducing direct receipts from the banks to the general Government sector and what this is expected to be for 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50237/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

General Government Debt

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.