Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 371

371. Deputy Louise O'Reilly asked the Minister for Housing; Local Government and Heritage if he is satisfied that the correct legal decision threshold is being applied to relevant evidence and submissions when he is deciding whether any given wild bird species should be included or not included on schedule 1 of the declarations with regard to annual State-wide wild bird derogation declarations (public health and safety); if he will set out the specific decision threshold that is being applied; and the specific legal clauses in the 1979 birds directive EU law that the decision threshold being applied in declarations relies upon. [46604/21]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 September 2021

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 September 2021

Summary

371. Deputy Louise O'Reilly asked the Minister for Housing; Local Government and Heritage if he is satisfied that the correct legal decision threshold is being applied to relevant evidence and submissions when he is deciding whether any given wild bird species should be included or not included on schedule 1 of the declarations with regard to annual State-wide wild bird derogation declarations (public health and safety); if he will set out the specific decision threshold that is being applied; and the specific legal clauses in the 1979 birds directive EU law that the decision threshold being applied in declarations relies upon. [46604/21]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Wildlife Regulations

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.