373. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 103 of 19 October 2016, the reason provision was not made in the revised scheme for refunds of the spouses' and children's payment to be claimed by persons without a spouse or a child, in view of the fact that such a provision had existed previously; and the provisions in the revised scheme that preclude such a refund. [32101/16]

Summary

373. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 103 of 19 October 2016, the reason provision was not made in the revised scheme for refunds of the spouses' and children's payment to be claimed by persons without a spouse or a child, in view of the fact that such a provision had existed previously; and the provisions in the revised scheme that preclude such a refund. [32101/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Public Sector Pensions

  xml · EN · 25 October 2016

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.