Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 376

549 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Transport if he has received a cost-benefit analysis from the European Commission proving the benefits of the eCall system if applied here; if this study is at variance with an internal study carried out previously by him; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30786/09]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 September 2009

Last action

16 September 2009 · EU Surveys.

Status

written

Sponsors

John O'Mahony

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

16 September 2009

Transport

Summary

549 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Transport if he has received a cost-benefit analysis from the European Commission proving the benefits of the eCall system if applied here; if this study is at variance with an internal study carried out previously by him; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30786/09]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 September 2009

    EU Surveys.

    549 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Transport if he has received a cost-benefit analysis from the European Commission proving the benefits of the eCall system if applied here; if this study is at variance with an internal study carried out previously by him; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30786/09]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • John O'Mahony · Asking member
  • Minister for Transport · Minister for Transport · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.