PQ 376
376. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the reason persons in counties Donegal and Mayo are not entitled to 100% of costs regarding remedial work and temporary accommodation in dealing with mica in view of the fact persons with pyrite in counties Dublin, Meath, Kildare, Wicklow, Limerick and Clare are receiving 100% costs and up to €7,000 towards accommodation, removal, storage and return of furniture and so on to the dwelling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34581/20]
Introduced
10 November 2020
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
10 November 2020
Summary
376. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the reason persons in counties Donegal and Mayo are not entitled to 100% of costs regarding remedial work and temporary accommodation in dealing with mica in view of the fact persons with pyrite in counties Dublin, Meath, Kildare, Wicklow, Limerick and Clare are receiving 100% costs and up to €7,000 towards accommodation, removal, storage and return of furniture and so on to the dwelling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34581/20]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Mica Redress Scheme
Mica Redress Scheme
xml · EN · 10 November 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2020-11-10/376/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2020-11-10/pq_376