PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 383

383. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to his reply to correspondence to him from this Deputy of 3 April 2017 concerning community employment schemes and the issue of a pension entitlement (details supplied), the progress made to resolve this dispute; if he will host talks with the stakeholders with the view to resolve this dispute; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24448/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

23 May 2017

Last action

23 May 2017 · Pension Provisions

Status

written

Sponsors

Pearse Doherty

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 May 2017

Summary

383. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to his reply to correspondence to him from this Deputy of 3 April 2017 concerning community employment schemes and the issue of a pension entitlement (details supplied), the progress made to resolve this dispute; if he will host talks with the stakeholders with the view to resolve this dispute; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24448/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 May 2017

    Pension Provisions

    383. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to his reply to correspondence to him from this Deputy of 3 April 2017 concerning community employment schemes and the issue of a pension entitlement (details supplied), the progress made to resolve this dispute; if he will host talks with the stakeholders with the view to resolve this dispute; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24448/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Pension Provisions

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.