PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 384

384. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Education and Skills the number of children in receipt of pre-school home tuition based on special educational needs; the number of households receiving home tuition in which there is more than one child in receipt of the home tuition; the number of these who are under and over three years of age, respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55163/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 January 2018

Last action

16 January 2018 · Home Tuition Scheme Provision

Status

written

Sponsors

Ó Cuív, Éamon.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

16 January 2018

Education

Summary

384. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Education and Skills the number of children in receipt of pre-school home tuition based on special educational needs; the number of households receiving home tuition in which there is more than one child in receipt of the home tuition; the number of these who are under and over three years of age, respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55163/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 January 2018

    Home Tuition Scheme Provision

    384. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Education and Skills the number of children in receipt of pre-school home tuition based on special educational needs; the number of households receiving home tuition in which there is more than one child in receipt of the home tuition; the number of these who are under and over three years of age, respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55163/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Home Tuition Scheme Provision

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.