Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 387

387. Deputy Marian Harkin asked the Minister for Finance if the power of seizure pursuant to section 141 of the Finance Act 2001 as amended may only be lawfully used when the Revenue Commissioners VRT enforcement officers have adequate evidence to make a determination of liability to forfeiture; if the power of detention pursuant to section 140 of the Finance Act 2001 as amended must be used instead in cases in which enforcement officers of the Revenue Commissioners VRT reasonably suspect a VRT offence has been committed but require further evidence in order to make such a determination; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40305/21]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

27 July 2021

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

27 July 2021

Summary

387. Deputy Marian Harkin asked the Minister for Finance if the power of seizure pursuant to section 141 of the Finance Act 2001 as amended may only be lawfully used when the Revenue Commissioners VRT enforcement officers have adequate evidence to make a determination of liability to forfeiture; if the power of detention pursuant to section 140 of the Finance Act 2001 as amended must be used instead in cases in which enforcement officers of the Revenue Commissioners VRT reasonably suspect a VRT offence has been committed but require further evidence in order to make such a determination; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40305/21]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Revenue Commissioners

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.