Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 387

387. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the rationale that his Department is relying on (details supplied) to bolster the suggestion that the costs calculations of the defective concrete blocks grant scheme should be based on typical speculatively built homes to a standard quality specification in compliance with building regulations and standards in place prior to the introduction of SI. No. 854/2007 building regulations (amendment) regulations 2007; given that all other homes in Ireland can avail of grants to upgrade to B2 BER; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8337/22]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 February 2022

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 February 2022

Summary

387. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the rationale that his Department is relying on (details supplied) to bolster the suggestion that the costs calculations of the defective concrete blocks grant scheme should be based on typical speculatively built homes to a standard quality specification in compliance with building regulations and standards in place prior to the introduction of SI. No. 854/2007 building regulations (amendment) regulations 2007; given that all other homes in Ireland can avail of grants to upgrade to B2 BER; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8337/22]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Defective Building Materials

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.