PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 39

135 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will consider giving widows and widowers who are under the age of 66 and do not qualify for the carer's allowance or the respite care grant at least the respite grant, in view of the fact that they are full-time carers but receive no recognition of this fact by her Department in the form of a payment. [4019/04]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

11 February 2004

Last action

11 February 2004 · Social Welfare Benefits.

Status

written

Sponsors

Naughten, Denis.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 February 2004

Summary

135 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will consider giving widows and widowers who are under the age of 66 and do not qualify for the carer's allowance or the respite care grant at least the respite grant, in view of the fact that they are full-time carers but receive no recognition of this fact by her Department in the form of a payment. [4019/04]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 11 February 2004

    Social Welfare Benefits.

    135 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will consider giving widows and widowers who are under the age of 66 and do not qualify for the carer's allowance or the respite care grant at least the respite grant, in view of the fact that they are full-time carers but receive no recognition of this fact by her Department in the form of a payment. [4019/04]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Social Welfare Benefits.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Naughten, Denis. · Asking member
  • Minister for Family · Minister for Family · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.