PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 395

395. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his plans to unwind the pay and pension inequality in his annual review of FEMPI measures due before Dáil Éireann by the end of June 2017; his further plans regarding the restoration of pay for teachers and the ending of PSPR in view of the fact that the financial crisis has ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28411/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

20 June 2017

Last action

20 June 2017 · Public Service Pay Commission

Status

written

Sponsors

Shortall, Róisín.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

20 June 2017

Summary

395. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his plans to unwind the pay and pension inequality in his annual review of FEMPI measures due before Dáil Éireann by the end of June 2017; his further plans regarding the restoration of pay for teachers and the ending of PSPR in view of the fact that the financial crisis has ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28411/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 June 2017

    Public Service Pay Commission

    395. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his plans to unwind the pay and pension inequality in his annual review of FEMPI measures due before Dáil Éireann by the end of June 2017; his further plans regarding the restoration of pay for teachers and the ending of PSPR in view of the fact that the financial crisis has ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28411/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Public Service Pay Commission

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.