Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 396

396. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health in respect of the Redress for Women Resident in Certain Institutions Bill 2014, if the dental, ophthalmic and aural services will be equivalent to those set out in appendix G of Judge Quirke's report, Health Amendment Act 1996 card guide, that is, if Magdalen women will be able to obtain any and all dental, ophthalmic and aural primary care services, including from private practitioners; and if referred for hospital treatment, if Magdalen women will receive an appointment within two weeks, as Health Amendment Act 1996 cardholders do; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8966/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

3 March 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 March 2015

Summary

396. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health in respect of the Redress for Women Resident in Certain Institutions Bill 2014, if the dental, ophthalmic and aural services will be equivalent to those set out in appendix G of Judge Quirke's report, Health Amendment Act 1996 card guide, that is, if Magdalen women will be able to obtain any and all dental, ophthalmic and aural primary care services, including from private practitioners; and if referred for hospital treatment, if Magdalen women will receive an appointment within two weeks, as Health Amendment Act 1996 cardholders do; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8966/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Magdalen Laundries

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.