426 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, further to Parliamentary Question No. 130 of 14 April 2005, the reason a person who was legitimately approved for a back to work scheme by the Department of Social and Family Affairs should, as a result, be victimised by having their application for naturalisation refused on the grounds that they received a payment from the State; if his attention has been drawn to the basis and purpose of the back to work scheme, that is a work supportive initiative; if it is his intention to respond negatively to any person who qualifies for this scheme in the future; if non-nationals should be deprived of such schemes in the future; if his action is in accord with international human rights requirements; the number of applications for naturalisation he has refused on this or a similar basis; if he intends to apply this rule in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14284/05]

Summary

426 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, further to Parliamentary Question No. 130 of 14 April 2005, the reason a person who was legitimately approved for a back to work scheme by the Department of Social and Family Affairs should, as a result, be victimised by having their application for naturalisation refused on the grounds that they received a payment from the State; if his attention has been drawn to the basis and purpose of the back to work scheme, that is a work supportive initiative; if it is his intention to respond negatively to any person who qualifies for this scheme in the future; if non-nationals should be deprived of such schemes in the future; if his action is in accord with international human rights requirements; the number of applications for naturalisation he has refused on this or a similar basis; if he intends to apply this rule in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14284/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 4 May 2005

   Citizenship Applications.

   426 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, further to Parliamentary Question No. 130 of 14 April 2005, the reason a person who was legitimately approved for a back to work scheme by the Department of Social and Family Affairs should, as a result, be victimised by having their application for naturalisation refused on the grounds that they received a payment from the State; if his attention has been drawn to the basis and purpose of the back to work scheme, that is a work supportive initiative; if it is his intention to respond negatively to any person who qualifies for this scheme in the future; if non-nationals should be deprived of such schemes in the future; if his action is in accord with international human rights requirements; the number of applications for naturalisation he has refused on this or a similar basis; if he intends to apply this rule in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14284/05]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Citizenship Applications.

  xml · EN · 4 May 2005

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Durkan, Bernard J. · Asking member
• Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform · Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.