PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 40

33 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare the discussions, if any, he has had with groups representing people with disabilities concerning his intentions in relation to the disabled person's maintenance allowance; the names of any such groups he has met; and the intention, if any, he has to meet any such groups in the near future. [10620/95]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 June 1995

Last action

13 June 1995 · Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Mary Wallace

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 June 1995

Summary

33 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare the discussions, if any, he has had with groups representing people with disabilities concerning his intentions in relation to the disabled person's maintenance allowance; the names of any such groups he has met; and the intention, if any, he has to meet any such groups in the near future. [10620/95]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 June 1995

    Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

    33 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare the discussions, if any, he has had with groups representing people with disabilities concerning his intentions in relation to the disabled person's maintenance allowance; the names of any such groups he has met; and the intention, if any, he has to meet any such groups in the near future. [10620/95]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Mary Wallace · Asking member
  • Minister for Social Welfare · Minister for Social Welfare · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.