Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 400

497 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Finance the reason for stamp duty on second-hand houses; his views on whether the present system penalises purchasers trading up to their second or third house; his further views on whether the present system is unfair due to the fact that the salary of the buyer is not taken into account, the fact of the purchase being undertaken by a single person or a couple is not taken into account and the equity earned on the existing property is not taken into account; if the stamp duty regime unduly penalises persons buying houses in Dublin; if he will review these issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24926/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 September 2005

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 September 2005

Summary

497 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Finance the reason for stamp duty on second-hand houses; his views on whether the present system penalises purchasers trading up to their second or third house; his further views on whether the present system is unfair due to the fact that the salary of the buyer is not taken into account, the fact of the purchase being undertaken by a single person or a couple is not taken into account and the equity earned on the existing property is not taken into account; if the stamp duty regime unduly penalises persons buying houses in Dublin; if he will review these issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24926/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.