PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 403

403. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Health his plans to re-examine the conditions by which consultants can prescribe medicinal cannabis for persons with Dravet syndrome in such a way as to not make them personally liable for their entire treatment thereafter which understandably makes them reluctant to prescribe medicinal cannabis in these situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43446/18]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

23 October 2018

Last action

23 October 2018 · Clinical Indemnity Scheme

Status

written

Sponsors

Fleming, Sean.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 October 2018

Summary

403. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Health his plans to re-examine the conditions by which consultants can prescribe medicinal cannabis for persons with Dravet syndrome in such a way as to not make them personally liable for their entire treatment thereafter which understandably makes them reluctant to prescribe medicinal cannabis in these situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43446/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 October 2018

    Clinical Indemnity Scheme

    403. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Health his plans to re-examine the conditions by which consultants can prescribe medicinal cannabis for persons with Dravet syndrome in such a way as to not make them personally liable for their entire treatment thereafter which understandably makes them reluctant to prescribe medicinal cannabis in these situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43446/18]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Clinical Indemnity Scheme

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.