481 Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 106 of 2 March 2004, which confirmed that a draft protected area order proposed by his Department in the 1950s provided for four sub areas A, B, C and D in the general environs of Baldonnel Aerodrome; if a site (details supplied), to which his Department objected was situated within any of the said sub areas A, B, C or D; if so, the sub areas in question; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18509/08]

Summary

481 Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 106 of 2 March 2004, which confirmed that a draft protected area order proposed by his Department in the 1950s provided for four sub areas A, B, C and D in the general environs of Baldonnel Aerodrome; if a site (details supplied), to which his Department objected was situated within any of the said sub areas A, B, C or D; if so, the sub areas in question; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18509/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Planning Issues.

  xml · EN · 13 May 2008

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.