Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 411

413 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 409 of 14 June 2005, his views on whether the work on the section on which the accident took place could not possibly have been completed in that a permanent surface still needed to be applied and the application of these lines to the road were clearly premature in that they were meant to be applied after the job was completed, which it clearly was not; his further views on whether, in view of the foregoing, the HSA should investigate the circumstances of this accident; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22055/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 June 2005

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 June 2005

Summary

413 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 409 of 14 June 2005, his views on whether the work on the section on which the accident took place could not possibly have been completed in that a permanent surface still needed to be applied and the application of these lines to the road were clearly premature in that they were meant to be applied after the job was completed, which it clearly was not; his further views on whether, in view of the foregoing, the HSA should investigate the circumstances of this accident; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22055/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Health and Safety Authority Investigations.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.