PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 42

123 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will elaborate on the opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice in the case of the European Commission versus Ireland relating to the Government decision to extend the payment delivery services contract with An Post; and the way in which same is expected to impact future delivery of the service. [31782/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

10 October 2006

Last action

10 October 2006 · Departmental Contracts.

Status

written

Sponsors

Cuffe, Ciarán.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 October 2006

Summary

123 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will elaborate on the opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice in the case of the European Commission versus Ireland relating to the Government decision to extend the payment delivery services contract with An Post; and the way in which same is expected to impact future delivery of the service. [31782/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 October 2006

    Departmental Contracts.

    123 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will elaborate on the opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice in the case of the European Commission versus Ireland relating to the Government decision to extend the payment delivery services contract with An Post; and the way in which same is expected to impact future delivery of the service. [31782/06]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Contracts.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Cuffe, Ciarán. · Asking member
  • Minister for Family · Minister for Family · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.