Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 422

422. Deputy Ann Phelan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the justification for not having an independent arbitrator in the insolvency process to act on behalf of debtors, when one party to the process, that is, the financial institution, is allowed a clear veto; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11984/14]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

11 March 2014

Last action

11 March 2014 · Personal Insolvency Act

Status

written

Sponsors

Ann Phelan

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 March 2014

Summary

422. Deputy Ann Phelan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the justification for not having an independent arbitrator in the insolvency process to act on behalf of debtors, when one party to the process, that is, the financial institution, is allowed a clear veto; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11984/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 11 March 2014

    Personal Insolvency Act

    422. Deputy Ann Phelan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the justification for not having an independent arbitrator in the insolvency process to act on behalf of debtors, when one party to the process, that is, the financial institution, is allowed a clear veto; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11984/14]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Personal Insolvency Act

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Ann Phelan · Asking member
  • Justice · Justice · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.