PQ 43
43. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he has read the report by an eminent insurance claims expert (details supplied) which argues, based on insurance case law, that the denial of responsibility letter issued by HomeBond on 31 August 2011 in relation to pyrite cases has no basis in law and that the claims by householders were not invalidated by the High Court decision in James Elliot v. Irish Asphalt; his views on the implications of the work of the Pyrite Resolution Board; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22487/15]
Introduced
11 June 2015
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
11 June 2015
Summary
43. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he has read the report by an eminent insurance claims expert (details supplied) which argues, based on insurance case law, that the denial of responsibility letter issued by HomeBond on 31 August 2011 in relation to pyrite cases has no basis in law and that the claims by householders were not invalidated by the High Court decision in James Elliot v. Irish Asphalt; his views on the implications of the work of the Pyrite Resolution Board; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22487/15]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Pyrite Issues
Pyrite Issues
xml · EN · 11 June 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2015-06-11/43/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2015-06-11/pq_43