42 Deputy John Paul Phelan asked the Minister for Finance if it is reasonable that borrowers should be entitled to see the original contract that exists between the financial institution and themselves; if there is a law or regulation that requires the original documentation to be retained by lenders or is it more typical that the bank saves only the electronic files; and in the event that the original documentation is not available to the borrower, is that borrower entitled to an invoice detailing the precise services rendered. [6986/12]

Summary

42 Deputy John Paul Phelan asked the Minister for Finance if it is reasonable that borrowers should be entitled to see the original contract that exists between the financial institution and themselves; if there is a law or regulation that requires the original documentation to be retained by lenders or is it more typical that the bank saves only the electronic files; and in the event that the original documentation is not available to the borrower, is that borrower entitled to an invoice detailing the precise services rendered. [6986/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Consumer Protection

  xml · EN · 8 February 2012

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.