PQ 45
45 Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance if he shares the views of the three prominent economists (details supplied), who recently gave evidence before the finance committee, that the Government should not pay out the €3.1 billion due on the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation promissory note on 31 March 2012, but should seek a means to either write down or defer this obligation, and that the Central Bank has the means to do this without breaking the troika agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9938/12]
Introduced
22 February 2012
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
22 February 2012
Summary
45 Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance if he shares the views of the three prominent economists (details supplied), who recently gave evidence before the finance committee, that the Government should not pay out the €3.1 billion due on the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation promissory note on 31 March 2012, but should seek a means to either write down or defer this obligation, and that the Central Bank has the means to do this without breaking the troika agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9938/12]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Banks Recapitalisation
Banks Recapitalisation
xml · EN · 22 February 2012
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2012-02-22/45/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2012-02-22/pq_45