PQ 454
454. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the reason the NPWS did not comment on the lack of an NIS and or an EIS in its observations advising on the protection of surrounding networks in relation to a foreshore lease application (details supplied) in view of the fact that the screening process identified likely significant effects on the integrity of sites (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [17883/17]
Introduced
11 April 2017
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
11 April 2017
Summary
454. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the reason the NPWS did not comment on the lack of an NIS and or an EIS in its observations advising on the protection of surrounding networks in relation to a foreshore lease application (details supplied) in view of the fact that the screening process identified likely significant effects on the integrity of sites (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [17883/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
National Parks and Wildlife Service
National Parks and Wildlife Service
xml · EN · 11 April 2017
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-04-11/454/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-04-11/pq_454