PQ 48
48. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government his views on the advertisement of NAMA rental properties for sale on the basis of the potential for large rent increases and reports that a bank (details supplied) intends to sell off up to €1.9 billion in distressed buy-to-let mortgages to vulture funds, in view of the impact this could have on tenants; and if he has raised cross-cutting issues that affect housing with the Minister for Finance, including at the Cabinet sub-committee on housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35429/16]
Introduced
17 November 2016
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 November 2016
Summary
48. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government his views on the advertisement of NAMA rental properties for sale on the basis of the potential for large rent increases and reports that a bank (details supplied) intends to sell off up to €1.9 billion in distressed buy-to-let mortgages to vulture funds, in view of the impact this could have on tenants; and if he has raised cross-cutting issues that affect housing with the Minister for Finance, including at the Cabinet sub-committee on housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35429/16]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
NAMA Assets Sale
NAMA Assets Sale
xml · EN · 17 November 2016
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2016-11-17/48/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2016-11-17/pq_48