PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 482

482. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the position in relation to the non-principal private residence charge where a person lived in their house for some years with their spouse who then remained resident in the house when the home owner travelled to another jurisdiction in order to gain employment to support them as a family; if the property will be subject to non-principal private residence charge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19236/14]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

30 April 2014

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

30 April 2014

Summary

482. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the position in relation to the non-principal private residence charge where a person lived in their house for some years with their spouse who then remained resident in the house when the home owner travelled to another jurisdiction in order to gain employment to support them as a family; if the property will be subject to non-principal private residence charge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19236/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Non-Principal Private Residence Charge Administration

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.