PQ 482
482. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the position in relation to the non-principal private residence charge where a person lived in their house for some years with their spouse who then remained resident in the house when the home owner travelled to another jurisdiction in order to gain employment to support them as a family; if the property will be subject to non-principal private residence charge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19236/14]
Introduced
30 April 2014
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
30 April 2014
Summary
482. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the position in relation to the non-principal private residence charge where a person lived in their house for some years with their spouse who then remained resident in the house when the home owner travelled to another jurisdiction in order to gain employment to support them as a family; if the property will be subject to non-principal private residence charge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19236/14]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Non-Principal Private Residence Charge Administration
Non-Principal Private Residence Charge Administration
xml · EN · 30 April 2014
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2014-04-30/482/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2014-04-30/pq_482