PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 497

589 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will restore full-time provision of a special needs assistant to a person (details supplied) in County Louth; his views on the fact that they must contend with a substantial disability, thus making a full-time special needs assistant essential; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3135/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

26 January 2010

Last action

26 January 2010 · Special Educational Needs.

Status

written

Sponsors

Morgan, Arthur.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

26 January 2010

Education

Summary

589 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will restore full-time provision of a special needs assistant to a person (details supplied) in County Louth; his views on the fact that they must contend with a substantial disability, thus making a full-time special needs assistant essential; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3135/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 26 January 2010

    Special Educational Needs.

    589 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will restore full-time provision of a special needs assistant to a person (details supplied) in County Louth; his views on the fact that they must contend with a substantial disability, thus making a full-time special needs assistant essential; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3135/10]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Special Educational Needs.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Morgan, Arthur. · Asking member
  • Minister for Education and Science · Minister for Education and Science · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.