51. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 23 of 21November 2012, the reason there was no consultation with any organisation or body which represents commercial ratepayers in drafting the Valuation (Amendment) (No.2) Bill 2012; the reason no redefinition of the material change of circumstances provision has been included in the legislation to combat the narrow interpretation currently employed by the Valuation Office which does not allow for changes in economic circumstances to be taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3050/13]

Summary

51. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 23 of 21November 2012, the reason there was no consultation with any organisation or body which represents commercial ratepayers in drafting the Valuation (Amendment) (No.2) Bill 2012; the reason no redefinition of the material change of circumstances provision has been included in the legislation to combat the narrow interpretation currently employed by the Valuation Office which does not allow for changes in economic circumstances to be taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3050/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Proposed Legislation

  xml · EN · 23 January 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.