Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 523

548 Deputy Paul J. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine whether it is possible that although a 40% penalty was imposed for 2010 because a person (details supplied) in County Galway could not prove the presence of horses on their land, now that the person can prove that the horses are in situ on their land through having their horses blood-typed in 2011 that the penalty would be removed for the remaining years; if he will outline the appeal mechanism available to the person; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3444/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 January 2012

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 January 2012

Summary

548 Deputy Paul J. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine whether it is possible that although a 40% penalty was imposed for 2010 because a person (details supplied) in County Galway could not prove the presence of horses on their land, now that the person can prove that the horses are in situ on their land through having their horses blood-typed in 2011 that the penalty would be removed for the remaining years; if he will outline the appeal mechanism available to the person; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3444/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.