Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 527

527. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Education and Youth if persons who interacted with Caranua are required to re-supply all details of their experience of institutional abuse while accessing supports for survivors of residential institutional abuse; if a GDPR-compliant means of data sharing and retention can be used in the management of supports for survivors of residential institutional abuse to avoid the need for survivors to repeatedly provide the same personal information, such as their names, proof of address, and other details that would have already been submitted to her Department and Caranua in the past. [45962/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 June 2026

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 June 2026

Summary

527. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Education and Youth if persons who interacted with Caranua are required to re-supply all details of their experience of institutional abuse while accessing supports for survivors of residential institutional abuse; if a GDPR-compliant means of data sharing and retention can be used in the management of supports for survivors of residential institutional abuse to avoid the need for survivors to repeatedly provide the same personal information, such as their names, proof of address, and other details that would have already been submitted to her Department and Caranua in the past. [45962/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Residential Institutions

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.