Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 53

73 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on a claim (details supplied) that the report of an archaeologist regarding the M3 motorway at Tara, County Meath was falsified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26938/08]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

9 July 2008

Last action

9 July 2008 · Archaeological Sites.

Status

written

Sponsors

Martin Ferris

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

9 July 2008

Environment

Summary

73 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on a claim (details supplied) that the report of an archaeologist regarding the M3 motorway at Tara, County Meath was falsified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26938/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 July 2008

    Archaeological Sites.

    73 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on a claim (details supplied) that the report of an archaeologist regarding the M3 motorway at Tara, County Meath was falsified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26938/08]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Archaeological Sites.

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Martin Ferris · Asking member
  • Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.