53 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Question No. 90 of 29 September 2011, the way it was determined that an Employment Appeals Tribunal hearing did not go ahead on 17 August 2010 when it in fact did take place, and the complainant was represented by a solicitor and a settlement reached; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31643/11]

Summary

53 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Question No. 90 of 29 September 2011, the way it was determined that an Employment Appeals Tribunal hearing did not go ahead on 17 August 2010 when it in fact did take place, and the complainant was represented by a solicitor and a settlement reached; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31643/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 26 October 2011

   Employment Rights

   53 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Question No. 90 of 29 September 2011, the way it was determined that an Employment Appeals Tribunal hearing did not go ahead on 17 August 2010 when it in fact did take place, and the complainant was represented by a solicitor and a settlement reached; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31643/11]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Employment Rights

  xml · EN · 26 October 2011

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Durkan, Bernard J. · Asking member
• Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation · Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.