PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 541

541. Deputy Michael Moynihan asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the reason for the continued ban on the killing of any sea trout in the Galway, Connemara or Ballinakill area in the Salmon and Sea Trout Regulations 2013 in view of the official IFI reports from fisheries such as Lough Inagh Lodge showing sea trout numbers in 2012 were comparable to 1985 levels; the length of time this ban on killing sea trout in the western river basin district has been in place; and the mechanism and policies in place to independently review this ban and return to the promotion of sea trout angling in the Connemara region. [28028/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

11 June 2013

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 June 2013

Summary

541. Deputy Michael Moynihan asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the reason for the continued ban on the killing of any sea trout in the Galway, Connemara or Ballinakill area in the Salmon and Sea Trout Regulations 2013 in view of the official IFI reports from fisheries such as Lough Inagh Lodge showing sea trout numbers in 2012 were comparable to 1985 levels; the length of time this ban on killing sea trout in the western river basin district has been in place; and the mechanism and policies in place to independently review this ban and return to the promotion of sea trout angling in the Connemara region. [28028/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Inland Fisheries Issues

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.