Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 571

571. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the number of persons that were convicted of fisheries or pollution offences under the Inland Fisheries Act 2010 between March 2015 and December 2016; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25804/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

30 May 2017

Last action

30 May 2017 · Inland Fisheries Ireland Investigations

Status

written

Sponsors

Thomas Pringle

Subjects

Climate

Source updated

30 May 2017

Climate

Summary

571. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the number of persons that were convicted of fisheries or pollution offences under the Inland Fisheries Act 2010 between March 2015 and December 2016; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25804/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 30 May 2017

    Inland Fisheries Ireland Investigations

    571. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the number of persons that were convicted of fisheries or pollution offences under the Inland Fisheries Act 2010 between March 2015 and December 2016; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25804/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Inland Fisheries Ireland Investigations

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Thomas Pringle · Asking member
  • Communications · Communications · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.