Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 571

571. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if he has any concerns about the quantum of cost estimated by the European Commission for implementation of quaternary treatment of urban waste water in the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive; if he has concerns about the allocation of those costs to just two economic sectors, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics; his views on whether this allocation is fully compliant with the polluter pays principle; if he will join with the concerns expressed by 16 other Member States in relation to these matters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44508/24]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

5 November 2024

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 November 2024

Summary

571. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if he has any concerns about the quantum of cost estimated by the European Commission for implementation of quaternary treatment of urban waste water in the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive; if he has concerns about the allocation of those costs to just two economic sectors, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics; his views on whether this allocation is fully compliant with the polluter pays principle; if he will join with the concerns expressed by 16 other Member States in relation to these matters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44508/24]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Wastewater Treatment

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.