PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 582

582. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to outline the policy and practice of the Environmental Protection Agency on the recovery and enforcement of legal costs, following the conclusion of judicial review litigation and in circumstances where the agency has been awarded its legal costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8068/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 February 2015

Last action

24 February 2015 · Environmental Protection Agency Expenditure

Status

written

Sponsors

Naughten, Denis.

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

24 February 2015

Environment

Summary

582. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to outline the policy and practice of the Environmental Protection Agency on the recovery and enforcement of legal costs, following the conclusion of judicial review litigation and in circumstances where the agency has been awarded its legal costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8068/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 February 2015

    Environmental Protection Agency Expenditure

    582. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to outline the policy and practice of the Environmental Protection Agency on the recovery and enforcement of legal costs, following the conclusion of judicial review litigation and in circumstances where the agency has been awarded its legal costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8068/15]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Environmental Protection Agency Expenditure

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.