PQ 59
59. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Finance if it would be appropriate for the National Asset Management Agency to make repeated demands for additional security over other assets, both unencumbered and encumbered, thereby prejudicing other creditors including the Revenue Commissioners, and if it is appropriate for NAMA to seek priority over other such creditors. [46570/14]
Introduced
4 December 2014
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
4 December 2014
Summary
59. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Finance if it would be appropriate for the National Asset Management Agency to make repeated demands for additional security over other assets, both unencumbered and encumbered, thereby prejudicing other creditors including the Revenue Commissioners, and if it is appropriate for NAMA to seek priority over other such creditors. [46570/14]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
NAMA Operations
NAMA Operations
xml · EN · 4 December 2014
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2014-12-04/59/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2014-12-04/pq_59