Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 59

59. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the number of persons who availed of the immigrant investor programme for each of the years 2012 to 2016; the amount invested; the reason the minimum investment has been doubled to €1 million; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2271/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

19 January 2017

Last action

19 January 2017 · Immigrant Investor Programme Data

Status

written

Sponsors

Michael McGrath

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 January 2017

Summary

59. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the number of persons who availed of the immigrant investor programme for each of the years 2012 to 2016; the amount invested; the reason the minimum investment has been doubled to €1 million; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2271/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 January 2017

    Immigrant Investor Programme Data

    59. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the number of persons who availed of the immigrant investor programme for each of the years 2012 to 2016; the amount invested; the reason the minimum investment has been doubled to €1 million; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2271/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Immigrant Investor Programme Data

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.