PQ 591
591. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht further to Parliamentary Question No. 59 of 16 October 2013, if the option of introducing a drop lock to replace the need of the lifting bridge has been considered since the establishment of Waterways Ireland or if that assessment was made by Waterways Ireland’s predecessors; the level of use of the sea level assumed in the assessment; if the impact of the Spencer Dock greenway was taken into account and vice versa, was account taken of the impact on the greenway were the sea level to be made accessible to navigation by replacing the lifting bridge; if the assessment includes analysis of whether the effective reopening of the sea level of the Royal Canal to meaningful levels of year round traffic would be consistent with the EU's commitment to the protection and preservation of cultural heritage, in view of the fact that Dublin's waterway's heritage is part of the cultural infrastructure of Europe, contributing to economic attractiveness, job opportunities and quality of life; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45987/13]
Introduced
5 November 2013
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 November 2013
Summary
591. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht further to Parliamentary Question No. 59 of 16 October 2013, if the option of introducing a drop lock to replace the need of the lifting bridge has been considered since the establishment of Waterways Ireland or if that assessment was made by Waterways Ireland’s predecessors; the level of use of the sea level assumed in the assessment; if the impact of the Spencer Dock greenway was taken into account and vice versa, was account taken of the impact on the greenway were the sea level to be made accessible to navigation by replacing the lifting bridge; if the assessment includes analysis of whether the effective reopening of the sea level of the Royal Canal to meaningful levels of year round traffic would be consistent with the EU's commitment to the protection and preservation of cultural heritage, in view of the fact that Dublin's waterway's heritage is part of the cultural infrastructure of Europe, contributing to economic attractiveness, job opportunities and quality of life; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45987/13]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Inland Waterways Maintenance
Inland Waterways Maintenance
xml · EN · 5 November 2013
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2013-11-05/591/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2013-11-05/pq_591