597. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if due process and fair procedures can be considered to have been followed in an application and appeals process in which the factual information provided by a social welfare inspector, later found to be incorrect, is relied upon to make the decision in respect of an appeal; the steps taken by her Department to ensure due process is followed in such circumstances to ensure fairness, impartiality and transparency in the decision-making process; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38891/20]

Summary

597. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if due process and fair procedures can be considered to have been followed in an application and appeals process in which the factual information provided by a social welfare inspector, later found to be incorrect, is relied upon to make the decision in respect of an appeal; the steps taken by her Department to ensure due process is followed in such circumstances to ensure fairness, impartiality and transparency in the decision-making process; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38891/20]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Social Welfare Appeals

  xml · EN · 24 November 2020

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.