PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 6

26 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs the impact the abolition of the ceiling on PRSI payments will have on the social insurance fund; the net cost of the social welfare increases announced in the budget, when these extra receipts are taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30016/00]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 December 2000

Last action

13 December 2000 · Priority Questions. - Social Insurance Fund.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Fitzgerald, Frances.

Subjects

Budget

Source updated

13 December 2000

Budget

Summary

26 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs the impact the abolition of the ceiling on PRSI payments will have on the social insurance fund; the net cost of the social welfare increases announced in the budget, when these extra receipts are taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30016/00]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 December 2000

    Priority Questions. - Social Insurance Fund.

    26 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs the impact the abolition of the ceiling on PRSI payments will have on the social insurance fund; the net cost of the social welfare increases announced in the budget, when these extra receipts are taken into account; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30016/00]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Priority Questions. - Social Insurance Fund.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Fitzgerald, Frances. · Asking member
  • Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs · Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.