Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 60

60. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence the number of occasions since January 2020 when a superior officer in the Defence Forces provided a statement in support of a defendant in a civilian trial in respect of an allegation of a violent crime; and whether he proposes to introduce measures to address this issue. [28122/24]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 July 2024

Last action

2 July 2024 · Defence Forces

Status

oral

Sponsors

Matt Carthy

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

2 July 2024

Defence

Summary

60. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence the number of occasions since January 2020 when a superior officer in the Defence Forces provided a statement in support of a defendant in a civilian trial in respect of an allegation of a violent crime; and whether he proposes to introduce measures to address this issue. [28122/24]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 July 2024

    Defence Forces

    60. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence the number of occasions since January 2020 when a superior officer in the Defence Forces provided a statement in support of a defendant in a civilian trial in respect of an allegation of a violent crime; and whether he proposes to introduce measures to address this issue. [28122/24]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Matt Carthy · Asking member
  • Defence · Defence · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.