PQ 600
600. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the benefit-to-cost ratio of the revised metro north project announced in the capital plan 2016 to 2021, when measured using traditional cost-benefit analysis; the benefit-to-cost ratio when the wider economic benefits are taken into account; and the economic case and appraisals for the project using different growth scenarios and benefit-to-cost ratio sensitivity tests. [39457/15]
Introduced
10 November 2015
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
10 November 2015
Summary
600. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the benefit-to-cost ratio of the revised metro north project announced in the capital plan 2016 to 2021, when measured using traditional cost-benefit analysis; the benefit-to-cost ratio when the wider economic benefits are taken into account; and the economic case and appraisals for the project using different growth scenarios and benefit-to-cost ratio sensitivity tests. [39457/15]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Public Transport Provision
Public Transport Provision
xml · EN · 10 November 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2015-11-10/600/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2015-11-10/pq_600