Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 650

650. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport whether he has sought and received legal advice on the compatibility of the proposed digital wallet social media verification scheme with Article 8 (right to privacy) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and with Article 40.6.1 of Bunreacht na hÉireann; whether the scheme, by design, will eliminate online anonymity for all Irish social media users; and whether the Government considers the removal of online anonymity a proportionate response to the objective of child online safety; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30139/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 April 2026

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 April 2026

Summary

650. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport whether he has sought and received legal advice on the compatibility of the proposed digital wallet social media verification scheme with Article 8 (right to privacy) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and with Article 40.6.1 of Bunreacht na hÉireann; whether the scheme, by design, will eliminate online anonymity for all Irish social media users; and whether the Government considers the removal of online anonymity a proportionate response to the objective of child online safety; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30139/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.