PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 655

684 Deputy Catherine Byrne asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the way the €10 million which was allocated in 2009 to develop cycle paths in Dublin along the Grand Canal to Fairview has been put to use; if there is any residual funding for additional stretches of the canal walkway which need to be upgraded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35886/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

22 November 2011

Last action

22 November 2011 · Cycle Facilities

Status

written

Sponsors

Catherine Byrne

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

22 November 2011

Transport

Summary

684 Deputy Catherine Byrne asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the way the €10 million which was allocated in 2009 to develop cycle paths in Dublin along the Grand Canal to Fairview has been put to use; if there is any residual funding for additional stretches of the canal walkway which need to be upgraded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35886/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 November 2011

    Cycle Facilities

    684 Deputy Catherine Byrne asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the way the €10 million which was allocated in 2009 to develop cycle paths in Dublin along the Grand Canal to Fairview has been put to use; if there is any residual funding for additional stretches of the canal walkway which need to be upgraded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35886/11]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Cycle Facilities

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Catherine Byrne · Asking member
  • Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport · Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.