56 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Defence if he plans to take action arising from the decision of the High Court to overturn a report of the Judge Advocate General which concluded that a decision to retire forcibly a person (details supplied) in 1969 was reasonable at that time; if he will allow this person access to documents that his predecessor ruled this person should not see until after the JAG report; if this decision has further implications for the Army and Defence Forces; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25929/05]

Summary

56 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Defence if he plans to take action arising from the decision of the High Court to overturn a report of the Judge Advocate General which concluded that a decision to retire forcibly a person (details supplied) in 1969 was reasonable at that time; if he will allow this person access to documents that his predecessor ruled this person should not see until after the JAG report; if this decision has further implications for the Army and Defence Forces; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25929/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Forcible Retirement.

  xml · EN · 29 September 2005

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.