PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 66

62 Mr. Howlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will confirm that more than 10,000 requests were made by the Garda during 2006 under the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005 for access to personal telephone records; his views on the view of the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner that such a number of applications suggests that innocent people are having their private records pored over; the breakdown of the requests submitted in regard to those arising from investigations into terrorist offences, drugs offences and other serious offences; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12902/07]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

4 April 2007

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 April 2007

Summary

62 Mr. Howlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will confirm that more than 10,000 requests were made by the Garda during 2006 under the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005 for access to personal telephone records; his views on the view of the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner that such a number of applications suggests that innocent people are having their private records pored over; the breakdown of the requests submitted in regard to those arising from investigations into terrorist offences, drugs offences and other serious offences; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12902/07]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Data Protection.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.